Court Rejects Defense Claims that Back Injury
Pain and Suffering Awards Excessive
By John Hochfelder on December 21, 2011Posted in Back
Injuries
Luis Ramos was sitting in a parked
car in the parking lane, on Claremont Parkway in the Bronx on September 24,
2001. He had been waiting for his son when he decided to exit the car. After opening
the driver side door about six inches, his car was struck by a passing city bus.
Ramos was sitting in a 1987 Ford
Thunderbird:
Ultimately, Ramos sued the transit
authority and on May 21, 2009, a jury found the bus driver 100% at fault for
the accident and awarded plaintiff pain and suffering damages in the sum of $595,000
($270,000 past – 8 1/2 years, $325,000 future – 9 years). Both the liability
finding and the damages award
were upheld on appeal last week in Ramos v. New York City Transit Authority
(1st Dept. 2011).
As indicated in the decision,
plaintiff was 59 years old at the time and he sustained multiple herniated
discs in his lumbar spine that required a combined discectomy,
laminectomy and spinal fusion four years later.
In a laminectomy, the surgeon
removes the bony back wall of the affected spine, called the lamina and then in
a discectomy, the surgeon removes the disc itself:
And here’s what the spine looks like
after the lumbar fusion surgery with the insertion of a metal plate and screws:
As to damages, the defense argued
that the jury award was excessive in view of plaintiff’s preexisting
conditions:
- degenerative disc disease (when
aging discs become stiff and dry out)
- scoliosis (a sideways curvature
of the spine)
- syrinx (a cavity in the spinal cord formed by
cerebrospinal fluid)
Plaintiff successfully countered
each of the defense arguments as to damages
through the testimony of his expert neurologist who stated that:
- both the scoliosis and the syrinx were in plaintiff’s cervical
spine and the likelihood that either of these conditions affected
plaintiff’s lumbar spine was extremely remote
- plaintiff showed no symptoms of preexisting low back
pain problems and the fact that he had been diagnosed with degenerative disc
disease two years before the accident was of no consequence because there
was no evidence (such as an MRI) that Ramos had a herniated disc before
the accident
Inside Information:
- Ramos refused medical treatment at the scene, reported
to work that night as a doorman in an apartment building, continued to
work for a few more days and did not seek any medical attention at all
until three days later when he presented to a neighborhood clinic
complaining of significant lower back pain.
- There were only three witnesses at trial – plaintiff, a
police officer and plaintiff’s medical expert, neurologist Ringa Krishna,
M.D. The defense produced neither its bus driver nor any medical expert to
rebut plaintiff’s claims and proof as to causation, pain, disability and
permanency.
- Unfortunately, the surgery failed and plaintiff’s
condition got worse. He was diagnosed with chronic nerve damage and
arthritis in his spine causing permanent low back pain and making it
difficult to walk. Ramos never returned to work.
- Plaintiff was granted a missing witness charge as to
the defense physician who was engaged before trial but did not testify at
the trial – the jury was told that it may infer that the defense doctor
would not have supported the defendant’s position with respect to the
medical issues and would not contradict the plaintiff’s medical evidence.
POSTED BY ATTORNEY RENE G. GARCIA:
For
more information:- Some of our clients have suffered this kind of
injuries due to a serious accident. The Garcia Law Firm, P.C. was able
to successfully handle these types of cases. For a free consultation please
call us at 1-866- SCAFFOLD or 212-725-1313.
No comments:
Post a Comment